Thursday, 23 Jul 2026

Seinfeld actor Jason Alexander points apology to Courtney Stodden as ‘inappropriate’ sketch resurfaces

admin
23 Jul 2026 08:28
Celebs 0 6
4 minutes reading



Jason Alexander has provided his ‘sincerest apologies’ after he was referred to as out for an ‘inappropriate’ sketch on-line.

The American actor and comic is greatest identified for his function as George Constanza on the long-running comedy collection Seinfeld, which noticed him win an Emmy award and earn 4 Golden Globe nominations.

It is honest to say that comedy has advanced lately and jokes which may have landed within the 90s merely would not be accepted lately, as SNL found once they have been broadly criticised for mocking Aimee Lou Wooden in a sketch final 12 months.

And actuality star Courtney Stodden has now publicly referred to as out Alexander for his function in a 2012 ‘Humorous or Die’ sketch that they starred in collectively, after he rubbed a a cellphone on Stodden’s breasts as a result of it was the one space with ‘loads of sign’.

If that wasn’t troubling sufficient already, Stodden was simply 17 on the time and he or she’s now spoken out to recommend that her function has grow to be more durable to grasp as she’s grown older, particularly because the cash that was constructed from it went straight into the pocket of her ex-husband Doug Hutchinson.

Courtney Stodden is campaigning for a change of legal guidelines in California (Tommaso Boddi/Selection by way of Getty Pictures)

In a press release issued to Selection, 66-year-old Alexander has now apologised for the sketch, which he helped to write down in addition to performing in.

He stated: “Wanting again on the comedy sketch by which Ms. Stodden and I participated in 2012, I utterly agree that it was inappropriate and I really remorse it. However extra importantly, I’m deeply sorry for any hurt or misery it has precipitated Ms. Stodden. I supply her my sincerest apologies.”

Jason Alexander has apologised for his function within the sketch (Christopher Willard/ABC by way of Getty Pictures)

Stodden made headlines when she was simply 16 after the previous baby magnificence pageant star married Inexperienced Mile actor Doug Hutchinson, who was 35 years her senior and was solely permitted to marry {the teenager} after getting permission from her mom.

Now 31 and divorced from Hutchinson, Stodden is campaigning for a change to the legal guidelines in California to cease youngsters from going by means of the identical expertise she needed to, and he or she used the sketch as simply one other instance of how she was sexualised from a really younger age.

Posting on Instagram, she wrote: “I used to be 17 years previous on this photograph. The older I get, the extra unimaginable that is to grasp. Throughout this comedy sketch, Jason Alexander repeatedly rubbed his cellphone throughout my breasts whereas saying there was ‘no sign’ in my head however ‘loads of sign’ in my chest. Later within the sketch, he joked that once I turned 18 he’d prefer to take me behind the sofa and ‘have his manner’ with me. IMDb credit him as one of many writers of the episode. As an grownup, that truth has grow to be more durable — not simpler — for me to grasp. I used to be a minor. I didn’t have the authorized energy to resolve whether or not I wished to take part. The contracts have been signed by adults. The pay examine went to [ex-husband Doug Hutchison]. The manufacturing moved ahead. I used to be the one baby within the room. I felt so alone.”

“Wanting again now, I don’t see comedy. I see a 17-year-old woman whose physique turned a part of an grownup joke,” Stodden continued. “Folks nonetheless say, ‘You selected to be there.’ Legally, I couldn’t make these selections for myself. That’s the purpose. I can’t change what occurred to me however I can ask myself: How did so many adults have a look at a minor and resolve this was acceptable? That’s precisely why I communicate out immediately. Kids deserve legal guidelines that defend them. They shouldn’t must grow to be adults earlier than realising the legislation ought to have protected all of them alongside.”

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *