- Mercedes opted for a split-specification setup at the Singapore Grand Prix to evaluate why its new aerodynamic upgrade underperformed in Malaysia.
- George Russell claimed a front-row Sprint grid spot running the older package, while Andrea Kimi Antonelli qualified seventh with the updated car.
- Trackside Engineering Director Andrew Shovlin admitted the results have sparked deep concern over wind tunnel correlation and 2026 technical development.
Mercedes Split-Spec Experiment Stumbles in Singapore
The Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team entered the Singapore Grand Prix Sprint weekend attempting a direct side-by-side evaluation across its garage, seeking answers after a major aerodynamic package failed to deliver in Malaysia. However, rather than resolving the technical mystery, running opposing car configurations at the Marina Bay Street Circuit has deepened the team’s engineering confusion.
During Friday’s Sprint qualifying shootout, George Russell piloted the older, baseline specification car to an impressive front-row starting position next to polesitter Max Verstappen. In stark contrast, teammate Andrea Kimi Antonelli ran the newest development parts but endured balance difficulties throughout the session, ultimately managing only seventh place.
Correlation Alarms for the Mercedes Pitwall
For Andrew Shovlin, the trackside engineering director for the Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team, watching the baseline configuration decisively outpace the major factory upgrade points to broader development concerns. The disparity between simulated expectations and real-world track performance presents an alarming indicator as the team works toward its long-term goals for the 2026 championship regulations.
After a difficult weekend in Malaysia, we decided to run our cars in split specification this weekend here in Singapore,
Shovlin explained to the media. It is not the easiest track to do that at, or have the Sprint format, as it often takes a bit of time to get the car set-up dialled in.
Although Russell’s result showed promising outright speed, the team could not celebrate the session given the fundamental questions it raised about its simulation tools. The fact that the older setup remains superior suggests Mercedes is grappling with persistent wind tunnel correlation discrepancies.
We’ve seen that today as while we’re pleased to see George on the front row, it has left us with a bit of head scratching to do to understand why the update is not bringing the performance step we expect,
Andrew Shovlin confessed.
Corner Entry and Braking Woes Hamper Antonelli
While Russell managed to extract maximum performance from the familiar specification, Antonelli wrestled with the characteristics of the upgraded chassis through the tight, low-speed sequences of Marina Bay. The lack of stability under braking prevented him from matching the sharp commitment needed on a street circuit.
Neither car had a great balance, although Kimi was lacking more confidence on the braking and entry phase, and that’s what you need to attack a qualifying lap here,
Shovlin noted regarding the championship leader’s struggles.
Strict Sprint parc fermé rules leave the team with very limited operational freedom before Saturday’s competitive running begins. Prevented from enacting sweeping setup overhauls, Mercedes engineers must rely on electronic adjustments and subtle front-wing angle modifications to steady Antonelli’s car.
We’ll keep working to understand why that’s the case,
Shovlin stated. We’ve got plenty of data around us to try and make some progress, and hopefully we’ll be able to get Kimi’s car in a better place for main qualifying tomorrow.
Why This Matters
Aerodynamic correlation issues are among the most difficult challenges for a Formula 1 team to diagnose and resolve. When physical track data repeatedly contradicts computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and wind tunnel models, development trajectories can stall for months. Because the split-spec test confirmed that older parts outperformed newer components, Mercedes faces immediate hurdles in unlocking lap time for the rest of the race weekend, while confronting the reality that future floor and bodywork upgrades planned at the factory may need a comprehensive reassessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Mercedes run two different car specifications in Singapore?
Mercedes chose to split specifications between George Russell and Andrea Kimi Antonelli to gather comparative, real-time data after their newly introduced aerodynamic package failed to produce the intended performance boost at the preceding event in Malaysia.
How did George Russell and Andrea Kimi Antonelli perform in Sprint qualifying?
Driving the older, baseline specification, George Russell qualified on the front row alongside Max Verstappen. Andrea Kimi Antonelli, running the newly introduced upgrades, struggled with stability under braking and finished seventh.
Can Mercedes change Antonelli’s car setup ahead of the Sprint race?
Due to Formula 1’s strict parc fermé regulations during Sprint weekends, Mercedes cannot carry out major structural or mechanical alterations. The team must rely on electronic parameter updates and fine adjustments to the front-wing flaps to improve Antonelli’s car balance ahead of main qualifying.




