Lisandro Martinez Criticizes VAR Decision in Manchester Derby Defeat
Manchester United defender Lisandro Martinez has delivered a scathing verdict on the controversial decision that allowed Erling Haaland‘s winning goal to stand during Manchester City’s 1-0 victory at Old Trafford. The Argentina international center-back believes the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) made an error in judgment that directly influenced the outcome of the high-stakes Premier League derby.
Offside Position Altered Defensive Shape
According to Martinez, Enzo Fernandez was clearly in an offside position during the build-up to Haaland’s decisive strike. The United defender argues that Fernandez’s positioning forced him to adjust his defensive assignment, which ultimately left the Norwegian striker unmarked at the back post.
“The offside position of Enzo Fernandez directly affected my decision-making,” Martinez stated in his post-match assessment. “I had to track his run, which pulled me away from Haaland at the crucial moment.”
Derby Defeat Extends United’s Winless Run
The loss marks another disappointing chapter in Manchester United’s season, extending their winless streak against their city rivals. Haaland’s clinical finish in the first half proved to be the difference between the two sides, despite United creating several promising opportunities throughout the 90 minutes.
Manager Ruben Amorim will be concerned by the team’s inability to convert pressure into goals, while the defensive lapse highlighted by Martinez’s comments raises questions about communication and positional discipline during set-piece situations.
VAR Controversy Reignites Debate
This incident has reignited the ongoing debate surrounding VAR implementation in the Premier League. Critics argue that the technology continues to create confusion regarding offside interpretations and their impact on defensive decision-making, while supporters maintain that the system ultimately delivers correct decisions more often than not.
The Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) has not yet released an official statement regarding the specific decision, but the controversy is likely to feature prominently in this week’s refereeing discussions.

