Key Highlights:
- Following an 83-minute rain delay, FIA race control took a bold decision to resume Sao Paulo Grand Prix qualifying on extreme wet tyres.
- Drivers faced severe aquaplaning in top gear down the straights before a rapid track evolution led to intermediate tyre crossovers in Q2.
- While veterans embraced the rain, younger competitors raised safety flags, with George Russell warning that racing in such conditions would risk catastrophic incidents.
A torrential downpour brought Formula 1 qualifying for the Sao Paulo Grand Prix to an agonizing standstill for one hour and 23 minutes. The extensive delay sparked immediate fears of a repeat of the 2024 weekend schedule, where persistent severe weather forced qualifying to be postponed until Sunday morning. However, a crucial break in the storm clouds arrived just in time. After safety car driver Bernd Maylander completed reconnaissance runs and approved the circuit’s standing water levels, race control took the assertive step to reopen the pit lane, sending the field back onto a treacherous track surface.
The Battle with Aquaplaning and the Extreme Wet Compound
The restart forced teams to fit the rarely deployed blue-walled extreme wet compoundāknown as the “x-wet.” Frequently criticized as an ineffective compound primarily suited for cruising behind the safety car, the Pirelli rubber proved essential for tackling the deep standing water across the circuit. With Pirelli stating that each full wet tyre disperses roughly 85 litres of water per second, heavy spray severely hindered rearward visibility, turning braking markers into guesswork as stopping distances increased dramatically.
Despite the challenges, the massive water displacement quickly worked to clear the racing line. Carlos Sainz, driving for Williams, pointed out how aggressive the FIA’s call was at the green light:
“It felt a bit punchy when we left on the x-wet because we were aquaplaning in sixth and seventh gear down the straights. And if you lose the car at those speeds, it’s always going to be a big one,” Sainz concluded after the session.
“Also, very little visibility when you were running close to a car, but we were not forced to run close to cars in quali, so you can create a bit of a buffer to see. But it was very sketchy for two laps. Then we managed to create that little bit of dry line and the tyres started working, the aquaplaning started to go away. Everyone managed to keep the car on track until the end of Q1, which was a bit of a surprise, to be honest.”
Liam Lawson mirrored the Spaniard’s assessment while commending the governing body for avoiding an outright cancellation, noting that when we started, it was extremely sketchy – I think we were definitely pushing it. But I like the fact that we were out there and not in the garage; I think obviously it is risky, but there weren’t that many incidents.
Track Evolution and the High-Stakes Intermediate Crossover
The sodden surface leveled the competitive playing field by neutralizing straight-line acceleration and top-end engine advantages. Low-speed downforce, tyre temperature management, and smooth throttle application became paramount. Fernando Alonso emphasized the mechanical nuance required, observing that the engine is very important in terms of drivability and the way it behaves in the corners, and we still have a little bit of an issue there
.
By Q2, a crucial transition point emerged. The full wet tyres began overheating along the drier sections of the middle sector, prompting teams to switch to green-walled intermediate tyres. Chasing grip became perilous, especially under heavy braking into Turn 12 where Sainz and Ollie Bearman both suffered off-track excursions, while newcomer Rafael Camara locked up and careened into the barriers to conclude Q2. By the time Q3 arrived, incoming weather radar forced drivers into a high-stakes, single-lap sprint to set a competitive banker before the rain struck once more.
A Generational Divide on Extreme Wet Conditions
The decision to conduct competitive running in adverse weather highlighted a split across the paddock. Mercedes driver George Russell offered a stark reality check regarding the difference between single-car qualifying gaps and wheel-to-wheel combat:
“I love driving in the rain – but at some point, if that was a race, that was no way we should be driving in it – the chances of seeing a really, really horrific incident is very, very high.”
While experienced racers such as Lewis Hamilton and Nico Hulkenberg expressed genuine enthusiasm for the challenging track state, younger drivers voiced pronounced hesitation. New champion Kimi Antonelli designated the session the wettest conditions I’ve ever driven [in]. So it was not the nicest of experiences
. Both Antonelli and Bearman argued that the circuit exceeded reasonable safety thresholds when Q1 resumed, although Bearman conceded that the sheer volume of water dispersed by the running cars ultimately improved overall track conditions.
Why This Matters
The aggressive handling of qualifying in Sao Paulo signals an evolving operational stance from the FIA regarding extreme weather. In recent seasons, race control has faced heavy criticism for extended red flags and delays whenever rain intensifies, often frustrating spectators and broadcasters alike. Demonstrating that modern cars on extreme wet compounds can safely clear track water without immediate pileups establishes a vital precedent.
Furthermore, with additional rainfall forecasted for Sunday’s Grand Prix, the real-world data gathered across Q1, Q2, and Q3 becomes invaluable. Teams now face critical overnight dilemmas: whether to break parc ferme regulations to modify downforce levels and suspension setups for a completely wet raceāsacrificing grid positions for a pit-lane startāor to retain high-compromise setups hoping the weather holds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was qualifying delayed for 1 hour and 23 minutes?
Persistent rainfall produced significant standing water across the circuit, making conditions unplayable until rain eased and safety car driver Bernd Maylander confirmed the track surface had cleared sufficiently for competitive running.
How much water do Pirelli extreme wet tyres disperse?
According to Pirelli data cited during the session, extreme wet tyres disperse approximately 85 litres of water per second per tyre, which aids track clearing but causes heavy spray and drastically reduces visibility.
Did any drivers crash during the wet qualifying session?
Yes. While drivers managed to keep their cars on track throughout Q1, conditions at the Q2 intermediate crossover caught several drivers out at Turn 12, culminating in newcomer Rafael Camara sliding into the barrier.



