Key Highlights:
- A vast majority of Championship, League One, and League Two clubs maintain under 30 days of available cash reserves, with over 60% carrying balance-sheet liabilities that exceed the book value of their assets.
- Mounting player wage bills continue to outpace sustainable revenues, causing average losses in League One to climb from 6% of turnover in 1992-93 to nearly 50% in 2024-25.
- Most sides across the English Football League (EFL) and National League lack formal contingency plans if owner subsidies suddenly dry up, leaving them ill-prepared for the Football Governance Act’s statutory deadline in May 2030.
Escalating Deficits and Dwindling Cash Reserves Across the English Pyramid
The financial stability of professional football clubs below the Premier League is deteriorating at an alarming rate, according to a stark new assessment examining operations across the English Football League (EFL) and the National League. A widespread liquidity crisis has left most teams competing in the Championship, League One, and League Two holding less than 30 days of operating cash. The underlying solvency metrics are equally concerning: over 60% of all EFL and National League clubs currently record overall liabilities that surpass the total book value of their assets.
This persistent vulnerability stems directly from escalating personnel expenses, with wage inflation surging across all divisions between the 2021-22 and 2025-26 campaigns. Twenty clubs—concentrated predominantly in the Championship, League One, and the National League—are committing upwards of 80% of their total club revenue exclusively to player salaries. Within League One, most outfits allocate more than 40% of their top-line income to player wages, while two outlier clubs are expending over 100% of their revenue on payroll alone.
Owner Subsidies and Looming Regulatory Deadlines
The continuous structural deficits have dramatically shifted the historical operating baselines of lower-tier English football. In the 1992-93 season, average League One losses represented just 6% of club revenue; by 2024-25, those deficits expanded to nearly 50%. In League Two, average operational losses have reached 40% of turnover. Rather than maintaining self-sustaining business models, numerous outfits depend entirely on owner funding provided on a just-in-time basis, relying on frequent capital injections distributed throughout the season to remain operational.
Because the majority of EFL and National League sides maintain no formal contingency plan if an owner becomes unable or unwilling to fund ongoing cash shortfalls, clubs face catastrophic downside risks due to severely constrained alternative financing channels. These vulnerabilities stand in direct conflict with incoming statutory obligations. In terms of both ongoing liquidity and balance-sheet solvency, the findings reveal that many football clubs would not currently meet the requirement under the Football Governance Act to hold ‘appropriate financial resources’.
Under legislative mandates, clubs have until May 2030 to achieve compliance with these baseline financial criteria.
Proposed Cost Controls and Forthcoming Premier League Support
In response to these compounding challenges, club executives are showing unprecedented alignment on implementing mandatory restraints. Seventeen out of 18 (94%) EFL club owners surveyed expressed clear backing for tighter cost controls. Summarizing this structural dilemma, one investor noted in the report that the single biggest issue is player wages
.
Addressing the ongoing crisis and the transition toward tighter regulatory thresholds, Kogan emphasized that club hierarchies acknowledge the necessity of enforceable spending parameters: Owners are very well aware of the need now for some sort of coherent structure in which costs are being managed,
Kogan explained.
Relief may hinge partly on finalizing a revised financial framework with England’s top tier. Kogan confirmed that an agreement covering redistributed wealth between the Premier League and the EFL is close to completion. Explaining the targeted rescue mechanism, Kogan noted: League One and the League Two clubs will receive significantly more funding [through a new deal with the Premier League].
Furthermore, Kogan pointed out that That funding will be used along with a development fund and a liquidity fund potentially to help them get over the humps they’re all currently facing.
Why This Matters
The findings outline a precarious economic reality across English football’s secondary and tertiary tiers. Lower-league clubs are operating with virtually zero margin for error, relying on private benefactors to bridge deficits that have multiplied several-fold since the early 1990s. With the Football Governance Act establishing an explicit statutory benchmark by May 2030, clubs can no longer rely indefinitely on irregular, hand-to-mouth equity injections. Bridging this structural gap requires both the rapid implementation of the impending Premier League financial redistribution package and enforceable, pyramid-wide wage controls to prevent newly distributed revenues from merely fueling further player salary inflation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What percentage of revenue are lower-league clubs paying toward wages?
Twenty clubs across the Championship, League One, and National League are devoting more than 80% of total revenue to player wages. Most League One sides spend over 40%, with two individual clubs spending in excess of 100% of their operational revenue on payroll.
What does the Football Governance Act require from EFL clubs?
The legislation mandates that clubs hold “appropriate financial resources” to safeguard both solvency and ongoing liquidity. A substantial number of clubs currently fall short of this standard but must meet compliance requirements by May 2030.
How will the pending Premier League agreement help EFL clubs?
According to Kogan, the anticipated redistribution agreement between the Premier League and the EFL will deliver significantly increased funding to League One and League Two sides. These allocations are slated to be paired with dedicated development and liquidity funds designed to stabilize clubs through immediate cash-flow shortfalls.




