Developer proposes Hard Fork to protect the Bitcoin code from quantum threats
- A new proposal aims to switch all Bitcoin stocks up to a certain period to quantum-resistant wallets.
- Es could die most important cryptographic change so far become Bitcoin, and it requires A network -wide coordination and hard split.
Bitcoin could stand on the threshold of its most important technological development so far. A new one introduced draft of the Developer Agustin Cruz sets the course for great change.
In theory is it A simple concept, but it is huge in its consequences: all existing Bitcoin are transferred from old wallets to new wallets that are based on a cryptographic infrastructure that can not be successfully attacked by quantum computers.
The The name of the proposal is Qramp (Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol)and he aims at The migration of Bitcoin of addresses that secured by the ECDSA standard areto addresses that are secured by quantum -resistant cryptography demand.
According to Cruz, the existing cryptographic system, especially those whose public keys are already being disclosed by transactions, could be at risk in the future.
Quantum computers are still in the early stages of their development, but if a sufficiently powerful Computer is builtcould he theoretically The private keys behind exposed Bitcoin-address crack.
The would give attackers control over these funds and endanger the safety of the entire Bitcoin system. To prevent this, Cruz is pushing a proactive change to safer cryptographic procedures.
Hard Fork Plan comes with warnings, tools and incentives
The proposed change is not optional; she would At the protocol level through a hard fork be forced a kind of network upgrade that not With earlier Versions of the software is compatible .
In this case, a Hard Fork would introduce an incompatible appointment, which the customers must have deducted their money from the old wallets.
Imagine the hard fork would At a block height 680,000 activated. Up to the block, the users then had 700,000 time to migrate their money. After that, every transaction that tries to use an old address would automatically von node be rejectedwho have carried out an upgrade.
During this migration period, both the old and the new quantum -resistant addresses would work normally, but users would receive warnings in their wallets or on explorers. These warnings would explain that the old money can no longer be spent after the deadline.
The proposal includes different Types of Quantum -resistant cryptographic procedures that are in future wallets could be used . These include hash-based systems such as XMSS or LMS and lattice -based procedures. Which procedures are used in detail is in one future update or a technical Documented.
To make the change easier, the wallet software could help helpful functions such as one Button “Migrate now “ Banner with countdowns or automatic migration tools contain.
Possible bonus incentives for an early changeover are also discussed, in particular to support technically less experienced users.
Hard Fork could secure millions in a resting Bitcoin
Despite the importance of protecting the network, becomes The proposed change not be simple. And It is a Hard Fork act , would have toall Bitcoin participants, miners, nodes, stock exchanges and Wallet developers upgrade their systems.
Without one width Approval could split up the network, which is too one Disorder would lead to earlier events such as the Bitcoin Cash Fork.
Another size Worry of the community Is the fate of the coins that are in addresses that not migrate can or want . In addition Listen wallets, inactive users and even the coins belong that they are assumed Creatorvon Bitcoin belong .
If These funds are not postponed before the deadline, they will be After this proposal permanently closed. Some community members argue That this is too risky and the credibility von Bitcoin injury.
Others are concerned about the unknown time of quantum progress. When quantum computing is a distant threat, it could be premature, at the present time a party schedule tongue . But if the quantum progress comes earlier than predicted, it will be too late to protect the network without such a drastic change.
The developer is aware of these problems. It suggests widespread test networks and the possibility of determining the time window for the changeover through real progress in quantum computing. Nevertheless, communication, education and a transparent implementation of the keys to this process would be.
No Comments