Investment steering on British: Lisa Gordon, chair of Cavendish Financial, says that Great Britain should Tax crypto purchases – not because the government would be close to the cash register – that is always – but because Gordon believes that this could be interested in young people in traditional, exchange -traded action.
According to her, there is currently an imbalance: When buying stocks, investors would have to pay a stamp tax of 0.5%, but there is no delivery when buying cryptocurrencies.
UK should tax crypto purchases to boost stock investing and the country’s economy, according to Cavendish chair Lisa Gordon. pic.twitter.com/onq681YJEG
— cryptothedoggy (@cryptothedoggy) March 24, 2025
She sees that many young people prefer cryptocurrencies because the purchase is tax -free and argues that the stock market makes far less attractive than crypto.
If taxes were levied on cryptopic, as well as on stocks, the equal opportunities of both forms of investment would be more balanced. Imagine there are only two shops. One is taxed, the other is tax -free – of course, consumers will flock into tax -free business, even if the quality there is not necessarily better.
However, the idea of tax cryptocurrencies comes at a very unfavorable time; Because the crypto industry in Great Britain faces serious challenges anyway. Several large banks suddenly cut their connections to crypto companies and no longer offer access. Customers were let down by their trading partners out of the blue.
Access to Fiat payment channels has been interrupted. Many crypto companies have difficulty dealing with the daily transactions. This state urges the question: Is the United Kingdom really ready to become a crypto hub? The industry still hopes for regulations that guarantee equal access to banking.
In any case, Lisa Gordon’s ideas are generally in line with government policy that accepts cryptocurrencies, but accompanied by strict regulations.
How CNF reporteda new law admits more powers to the law enforcement authorities to confiscate and also destroy crypto-assets who are suspected of being abused by criminals as “crime scenes”. It is considered necessary to contain money laundering and financing with “black money”, which has previously been freely postponed by digital assets.
The aim is to create a cryptosystem that is legal and efficient and does not harm the community. However, some are of the opinion that this approach shoots over the goal and leads to the fact that the Industry migrated to friendly countries.
In the meantime, the political scene has not been spared from cryptocurrency. The British legislature recently proposed a new regulation that would oblige all political candidates to disclose election campaign donations in cryptocurrencies.
The reason for this is serious: it is about transparency in the origin of donations – and hardly anything is easier to disguise in finance than the origin of cryptoassets. Political transparency is the most important bet. Since the parliamentary elections are still pending this year, this rule could be an important instrument to safeguard the integrity of democracy.
No Comments