
Chappell Roan’s nipple costume on the Grammys was extra intentional than you may suppose.
The world’s largest music occasion was as eventful as ever when it kicked off on Sunday night (1 February).
From Donald Trump threatening to sue the host over an Epstein joke, to Cher by chance asserting a useless artist as file of the yr – it had all of it.
In case you tuned in or are catching up, you additionally would have observed the American singer-songwriter rocking as much as the Grammys in an attention-grabbing costume.
Identified for hits like ‘Good Luck, Babe!’ and ‘Pink Pony Membership’, the 27-year-old wore a brown, wispy, chiffon frock, which seemed to be hanging from two nipple piercings.
However on nearer inspection, it seems these piercings have been prosthetics utilized to Roan’s chest.

And the look wasn’t simply stunning for the sake of being stunning – the costume was a up to date recreation by Castro Freitas of a legendary high fashion design by the late Manfred Thierry Mugler.
It was first proven on the Mugler runway in 1998, and again then, the silk slip actually did grasp from the mannequin’s nipple rings.
The design prompted a little bit of a stir then, and clearly, it nonetheless has that energy now. It was once more worn through the Spring/Summer time runway for 2026.

Roan’s make-up artist Andrew Dahling defined to Elle that the look was a nod to the previous.
“We’ve seen Chappell in so many campy, over-the-top seems, and I believe that with the pretend tattoos, the prosthetics, and the costume, we mentioned doing one thing a bit extra sultry—a bit extra actual,” Dahiling mentioned.
“It’s a Mugler medieval fantasy for the carpet.
“We wished the make-up look to be sultry and smoky, with a bit ’90s affect to honor the period this archival robe comes from.”

As you’d anticipate individuals have been very opinionated, with one individual tweeting: “They’ll name this ’empowering’ however name Sydney Sweeney ‘trashy’.”
“Why even put on garments at that time? Anybody else sick of the whole lot being hyper-sexualized?” a second penned.
“I don’t get why ladies are selecting this type of ‘type’ or assertion. I believe it simply seems gross,” one other wrote.

Not everybody was so offended, as a fourth person commented: “Ought to be a normal costume for all of the hotties to put on for my part.”
Another person additionally identified: “I like how ladies dressing this fashion all the time p**ses males off.
“If ladies disguise behind a pay wall, guess the gender that’ll be lining as much as pay to view. Stinking jealousy and hypocrisy.”

No Comments