The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are moving ahead with separate cryptocurrency regulatory initiatives as Congress remains in recess and the future of the CLARITY Act remains uncertain.
According to Decrypt, the agencies have launched a joint public comment process to clarify their respective jurisdiction over digital assets. The effort suggests that federal crypto oversight could take shape through agency rulemaking rather than a comprehensive law passed by Congress.
SEC and CFTC Seek Input on Crypto Jurisdiction
In June, the SEC and CFTC began seeking public feedback on swaps, security-based swaps, emerging products and the scope of each agency’s regulatory authority. The joint initiative reflects the growing complexity of digital assets, which can share characteristics of both securities and commodities.
The agencies are seeking clearer boundaries between their responsibilities to reduce regulatory gaps and provide greater certainty for crypto businesses and investors.
Former CFTC Chairman Chris Giancarlo and former SEC Commissioner Steven Wallman responded with a comment letter warning that poorly designed rules could drive profitable trading activity to overseas markets. Giancarlo, often referred to as “Crypto Dad” for his forward-looking stance on digital assets, and Wallman, a long-time advocate for regulatory modernization, argued that overly restrictive or unclear rules could weaken the U.S. competitive position.
Their letter underscores the challenge regulators face in balancing investor protection with continued innovation in the digital asset sector.
SEC Advances Proposed Digital Asset Custody Rules
Separately, the SEC has taken a major step toward creating a regulatory framework for digital asset custody. The agency recently asked the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to review proposed revisions to existing custody rules covering investment advisers and investment companies.
The specific provisions have not been made public. However, the proposal is expected to address how regulated entities can hold cryptocurrencies and other digital assets while complying with federal securities laws.
Clearer custody requirements could be especially significant for institutional investors that have been reluctant to enter the crypto market because of uncertainty surrounding asset safekeeping. A defined framework could provide the legal certainty needed to encourage participation from pension funds, endowments and other large investors.
It could also help address persistent industry concerns involving the theft, loss and insolvency of crypto custodians.
What the Regulatory Moves Mean for Crypto Markets
The SEC and CFTC initiatives come as the CLARITY Act remains stalled in Congress. The legislation is intended to define the agencies’ roles in overseeing digital assets, but lawmakers are currently on recess and the timing of future legislative action is unclear.
By using their existing authority, the agencies are moving to shape rules that could influence the cryptocurrency market for years. For market participants, this means compliance obligations may develop through agency guidance and rulemaking instead of through one comprehensive federal statute.
The outcome could have broad implications for crypto businesses, investors and financial markets. More precise definitions of securities and commodities could help resolve long-running classification disputes involving major cryptocurrencies such as Ether.
Strong custody requirements could also reduce systemic risks, improve market integrity and make the United States a more attractive base for cryptocurrency companies and investors.
FAQs About SEC and CFTC Crypto Regulation
What is the CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act is a proposed U.S. law intended to clarify the jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC over digital assets. It aims to define when a cryptocurrency is considered a security or a commodity, but it has not yet been passed by Congress.
Why are the SEC and CFTC working together on crypto rules?
Digital assets often have characteristics of both securities and commodities, creating legal ambiguity. The joint comment process allows the agencies to gather public input and coordinate their approaches to avoid conflicting regulations and ensure comprehensive oversight.
How could new custody rules affect crypto investors?
Proposed custody rules would establish a clearer regulatory framework for investment advisers and companies holding digital assets. The changes could increase institutional participation, improve security standards and reduce the risk of loss or theft, potentially strengthening market stability.
Related Reading
- Coinbase CEO: Entrenched Financial Interests Oppose Crypto Clarity Act
- Kalshi Permanently Bans Former Rep. George Santos Over Insider Trading
- Crypto funds see $3.2B weekly inflow, biggest since October 2025
- Ripple CLO: Clarity Act Vote Would Boost U.S. Jobs and Economic Growth
- Bitcoin posts best August since 2017 with 25% rally, but year-to-date losses persist
